with the "connection view",
we already have a green indicating sth. as "online", reuse that.
(the green used before is a bit too much of a muted color,
this does not reflect "activity" well)
i came over that when playing around with the layout on ios;
ios uses the same color now.
also many other apps use a similar, less muted green for "activity" or
"online".
* add dclogin scheme to qr code scan
* Update src/org/thoughtcrime/securesms/qr/QrCodeHandler.java
Co-authored-by: Asiel Díaz Benítez <asieldbenitez@gmail.com>
* Update src/org/thoughtcrime/securesms/qr/QrCodeHandler.java
Co-authored-by: bjoern <r10s@b44t.com>
* handle DCACCOUNT and DCLOGIN schemes on new intents
* keep existing function name, that is maybe not less confusing, but at least already known
Co-authored-by: bjoern <r10s@b44t.com>
Co-authored-by: Asiel Díaz Benítez <asieldbenitez@gmail.com>
* move webxdc private apps to separate tab
* switch to scrollable tab layout; fixed layout may look not-so-nice with more tabs and longer descriptions that get a tiny font then
* reword "Webxdc [content]" to "Webxdc Apps"
adding "App" to the term makes things much clearer to the user,
was "Webxdc" is about.
eg. on iOS, we have an app selector meanwhile,
calling that _just_ "Webxdc" in the menu or in the title makes it pretty
unclear to the user what this is about.
same for the tab "Webxdc" on desktop or the default description in the summary.
otoh, calling it _only_ "Apps" (as now), may also raise false expectations
and may be mixed with "normal" apps.
so, "Webxdc App" seems to be a good approach.
there is also the term "Mini App" [^1], we could also go for that,
but this is a broader discussion as this would give up the term "Webxdc" partly.
in any case, if there is few space in the UI,
it seems to be okay to abbreviate with just "App" or "Apps" as needed,
if it is otherwise clear that the thing is a "Webxdc App" or "Mini App".
[^1]: the term "Mini App" is aleady known for similar types of apps
(some "small app" running in a "super app")
cmp. https://www.w3.org/TR/mini-app-white-paper/#what-is-miniapp .
of course, our "Webxdc Apps" are not compatible with other "Mini Apps"
however, this is also not the case between "Mini Apps" of other vendors
which also have different focuses.
so "Mini App" seems to be a broader term and does not imply compatibiliy.
* use term 'Private Apps' for webxdc content
* add some translator hints
adbenitez