Files
apk-reverse/tests/cli/test_cli_contract.py
T
inliver233 2beade67f2 Reconstruction pass: make the gates tell the truth, make the package self-contained, keep the one-hop symptom index
An external audit of this repository landed on four structural findings, and this pass is the
response to them. Everything below was re-measured on this tree before being acted on; two of the
audit's claims needed a correction of my own, and both corrections are noted in place.

**The gates were optimistic, and one of them did not read content at all.**

  doctor.py    the capability table was hard-coded (`repack + sign = bool(java) and python`), so a
               machine with a JDK and no zipalign/apksigner was told it could re-sign; the script
               inventory was a hand-written list of 28 against 51 files on disk, omitting the nine
               most important scripts. It now scans the directory (`registered/checked = 52 / 52`,
               unjudgeable entries counted as `unknown`, never skipped) and resolves capability as a
               real requires-closure, reporting BLOCKED with the missing piece and an installable
               next step. Measured: the old doctor reports `[OK] repack + sign` on a JDK-only PATH
               where keytool, jarsigner, zipalign, apksigner and all eight smali jars are absent.
               The report is allowed to look bad; that is the point.
  check_commands.py (new)
               anchor checks prove a section exists, never that a command runs. This parses each
               script's argparse table with `ast` and checks every documented invocation against it.
               146 commands / 41 interfaces, 0 drift. It caught `sig_probe.py --live --pkg`, which
               does not exist -- the reference had been wrong since it was written.
  check_routing.py (new)
               the symptom index now has one home (`SKILL.md`, because symptom -> file must stay one
               hop) and the inventory has another (`references/routing.md`). This gate proves the
               mirror agrees, that every reference file is named, and that every script is named.

**so_constpatch.py was corrupting APKs it rebuilt.** The writer copied filename and timestamp onto a
fresh ZipInfo and recompressed the whole archive: 435-entry real package, `extra` lost on 205 entries,
`external_attr` rewritten on all 435, 132 untouched entries recompressed, and `resources.arsc` pushed
to an unaligned offset. Android's own `zipalign -c -v 4` fails the old output and passes the new one;
a 26-case fixture suite pins it, and `extractNativeLibs="false"` is now refused by default with a
pointer at `repack.py`. Fixing it exposed the same defect in `repack.py`, where `^lib/[^/]+\.so$`
cannot match `lib/arm64-v8a/*.so` -- so its alignment handling had never once fired on a real APK.

**The package was not self-contained.** 59 references pointed at the repository root, which `npx
skills add` does not install. They now converge on `references/evidence-summary.md` (capability,
conclusion, strength, evidence that ships) plus `evidence/` with the machine-readable companions: 8
references remain and each is explicitly labelled "repository root, not shipped". A drill in which
the new files were copied to an isolated directory and asked three questions answered all three.

**SKILL.md: 572 lines / 15,733 tokens -> 398 lines / ~10,900 tokens**, without losing the two things
that had to stay. The symptom index remains inline; the reference and script indexes moved to the
on-demand routing file. The freed budget went into making the rules *stronger*, not shorter: the
constraints section is now a table of thirteen non-negotiable constraints each paired with the check
that catches a violation, and the tooling obligations are instructions whose violation is a defect
(hedging language in SKILL.md: 1 line, down from a paragraph of hedged advice). Long references gained
a navigation head so a reader can decide from the top whether to load one.

**New: an executable test layer.** `tests/` (unit, CLI contract, no-device integration) plus
`pytest.ini`, `tests/run_tests.py`, a minimal CI job, and `evals/evals.json` written but never run --
stated as such in the file. 608 passed / 158 skipped / 25 xfailed. The 25 xfails are a work order, not
a pass: thirteen scripts report a missing input by exiting 1 instead of 2, seven let a traceback
escape, four treat `--help` as an error, and `preflight --json` lacks a `status` field. A regression
row for `dex_patch_bytes.py` reproduces a previous artifact byte-for-byte
(`67ae1e58e7a44777e5ac8f9f823ab21e…`) and additionally pins the four bytes that may move.

**Two real defects the new tests found in the tooling itself.** `check_repo.py` decoded subprocess
output with the locale encoding, so on a GBK console a script printing an em dash in its usage line
was reported as crashed; it now decodes UTF-8 explicitly. And a CLI contract test drove a *real
attached device* through `coldstart.py` -- logcat, screenshots, five orphan `adb logcat` processes --
which is fixed twice over: child processes run in a private temporary cwd, and the fifteen
device-bound scripts are never executed beyond `--help`/argument parsing.

**Quoting on the device side is now one implementation.** `devsh.su` escaped only double quotes, so
`;`, `$( )` and backticks in a caller-supplied value still reached the device shell while
`coldstart.Device.shell` quoted correctly. Both use `scripts/device_shell.py` now: POSIX single-quote
escaping, argv arrays by default, and identifier validation that refuses a malformed package, path or
component with exit 2 instead of a traceback. The integration test that used to pin the *defect* (it
asserted `su -c "…"` with `\"` escapes) now asserts the property, across five metacharacter payloads.

Gates: check_repo 0 problems (including the content-reading identity scan over git ls-files),
check_refs 0 dangling / 0 warning, check_routing coherent (53 symptom / 45 reference / 54 script rows),
check_budget 0 failure / 0 warning with the always-loaded body now measured in tokens rather than in
"narrative lines with the index excluded", check_commands 146 checked / 0 drift, pytest 608 passed.

Not done, and stated rather than implied: CI has never run on a runner; the evals have never been
executed; the 25 xfails are open; no device-side install/launch was performed in this pass.
2026-09-22 01:37:51 +08:00

263 lines
12 KiB
Python

"""CLI contract tests: every shipped script, four invocation shapes each.
What is asserted, per the repository-wide contract in REBUILD-BRIEF section 4:
1. `--help` succeeds and never prints an uncaught traceback.
2. An unknown flag is a usage error: exit 2.
3. An invocation with required arguments missing, or with every input pointed
at a file that does not exist, is a usage error: exit 2.
4. A script that advertises `--json` emits a parseable JSON document that
states a `status`.
5. Every observed exit code is one of 0/1/2/3/4.
Two clean outcomes are distinguished, and the distinction is the whole point:
* `xfail` means the script is on the tree and does **not** meet the contract.
The reason carries the measured value. The xfail list this file produces is
the work order for exit-code unification -- it is not a defect to be fixed
here, because every one of those scripts has an owner.
* `skip` means the scenario is not applicable or not reachable on a machine
with no device, no network and no frida. Those are coverage gaps, and they
are reported as such in docs/tool-verification/EXTENSION-test-harness.md.
Each scenario runs once per script and is cached for the session, so the suite
spends its time on assertions rather than on re-spawning interpreters.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import pytest
from conftest import all_scripts, run_script
from contract import (
CONTRACT_EXIT_CODES, DEVICE_OR_NETWORK_BOUND, JSON_REQUIRED_KEYS,
JSON_RUNNABLE, execution_refusal, has_option, missing_input_args,
parse_leading_json,
)
pytestmark = pytest.mark.cli
SCRIPTS = all_scripts()
BAD_FLAG = "--zzz-not-a-real-flag"
HELP_TIMEOUT = 60
SCENARIO_TIMEOUT = 12
def why(name):
if name in DEVICE_OR_NETWORK_BOUND:
return " (device/network bound: it may legitimately block)"
return ""
def require_returned(result, what):
if result.timed_out:
pytest.xfail("%s did not return within %ss%s; there is no exit code to check"
% (what, SCENARIO_TIMEOUT, why(result.argv[1])))
if result.returncode not in CONTRACT_EXIT_CODES:
pytest.fail("%s returned %r, outside the 0/1/2/3/4 contract vocabulary"
% (what, result.returncode))
def expect_exit(result, expected, what):
"""Pass when the measured code matches; otherwise record it as an xfail."""
require_returned(result, what)
if result.returncode != expected:
pytest.xfail("%s: contract says exit %d, measured %d%s"
% (what, expected, result.returncode, why(result.argv[1])))
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
# one cached run per script per scenario
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
@pytest.fixture(scope="session")
def help_results():
return {n: run_script(n, ["--help"], timeout=HELP_TIMEOUT) for n in SCRIPTS}
@pytest.fixture(scope="session")
def badflag_results():
return {n: run_script(n, [BAD_FLAG], timeout=SCENARIO_TIMEOUT) for n in SCRIPTS}
@pytest.fixture(scope="session")
def empty_results():
"""Bare invocations, for the scripts that may be run at all.
Device-bound scripts are excluded here too: their no-argument path is exactly
where several of them start doing device work (`usb_net_proxy.py` did not
return within 20 s when probed by hand), and this suite does not touch a device.
"""
return {n: run_script(n, [], timeout=SCENARIO_TIMEOUT) for n in SCRIPTS
if n not in DEVICE_OR_NETWORK_BOUND}
@pytest.fixture(scope="session")
def missing_results(help_results):
"""Argument-complete runs against a missing file, for the scripts that may be run at all.
Device-bound scripts are skipped here rather than executed and timed out: on
the host this harness was written on, `adb devices` reported an online device,
so running them would have touched real hardware.
"""
results = {}
for name in SCRIPTS:
if name in DEVICE_OR_NETWORK_BOUND:
continue
args = missing_input_args(help_results[name].output)
if args is None:
continue
results[name] = run_script(name, args, timeout=SCENARIO_TIMEOUT)
return results
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
# 1. --help
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
class TestHelp:
@pytest.mark.parametrize("name", SCRIPTS)
def test_help_never_crashes(self, name, help_results):
"""Hard assertion: an uncaught traceback from --help is a defect, not a drift."""
result = help_results[name]
assert not result.timed_out, "--help did not return for %s" % name
assert not result.has_traceback, result.output[-2000:]
@pytest.mark.parametrize("name", SCRIPTS)
def test_help_prints_something(self, name, help_results):
assert help_results[name].output.strip(), "--help printed nothing"
@pytest.mark.parametrize("name", SCRIPTS)
def test_help_exits_zero(self, name, help_results):
expect_exit(help_results[name], 0, "%s --help" % name)
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
# 2. unknown flag
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
class TestUnknownFlag:
@pytest.mark.parametrize("name", SCRIPTS)
def test_unknown_flag_is_never_success(self, name, badflag_results):
result = badflag_results[name]
require_returned(result, "%s %s" % (name, BAD_FLAG))
assert result.returncode != 0, (
"an unknown flag was reported as success:\n%s" % result.output[-2000:])
@pytest.mark.parametrize("name", SCRIPTS)
def test_unknown_flag_exits_two(self, name, badflag_results):
expect_exit(badflag_results[name], 2, "%s %s" % (name, BAD_FLAG))
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
# 3a. empty invocation
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
class TestEmptyInvocation:
@pytest.mark.parametrize("name", SCRIPTS)
def test_no_arguments_is_a_usage_error(self, name, help_results, empty_results):
"""Only applies when the script actually requires arguments.
A script whose usage block has no positional and no required option may
legitimately succeed with no arguments; demanding exit 2 from those would
invent a rule the contract does not state. Device-bound scripts are not run
at all -- see `contract.execution_refusal`.
"""
refusal = execution_refusal(name, "a bare invocation", help_results[name].output)
if refusal:
pytest.skip(refusal)
expect_exit(empty_results[name], 2, "%s with no arguments" % name)
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
# 3b. bad input
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
class TestMissingInput:
@pytest.mark.parametrize("name", SCRIPTS)
def test_missing_input_file_is_a_usage_error(self, name, help_results, missing_results):
if name not in missing_results:
pytest.skip(execution_refusal(name, "a missing input", help_results[name].output)
or "not executed for %s" % name)
expect_exit(missing_results[name], 2, "%s with a missing input" % name)
@pytest.mark.parametrize("name", SCRIPTS)
def test_missing_input_is_never_success(self, name, help_results, missing_results):
if name not in missing_results:
pytest.skip(execution_refusal(name, "a missing input", help_results[name].output)
or "not executed for %s" % name)
result = missing_results[name]
require_returned(result, "%s with a missing input" % name)
assert result.returncode != 0, (
"a missing input was reported as success:\n%s" % result.output[-2000:])
@pytest.mark.parametrize("name", SCRIPTS)
def test_bad_input_reports_cleanly_not_as_an_exception(self, name, help_results,
missing_results):
"""A missing file is an expected failure mode; it must not escape as an exception.
Several scripts currently let `FileNotFoundError` propagate. Each is
recorded here as an xfail naming the exception; the fix belongs to that
script's owner, not to this suite.
"""
if name not in missing_results:
pytest.skip(execution_refusal(name, "a missing input", help_results[name].output)
or "not executed for %s" % name)
result = missing_results[name]
require_returned(result, "%s with a missing input" % name)
if result.has_traceback:
tail = [l for l in result.output.splitlines() if l.strip()]
pytest.xfail("%s reports a missing input by letting an exception escape "
"instead of exiting 2 cleanly: %s"
% (name, (tail[-1] if tail else "uncaught exception")[:140]))
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
# 4. the --json contract
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
def json_capable(help_results):
return sorted(n for n, r in help_results.items() if has_option(r.output, "--json"))
def test_json_capable_scripts_are_discoverable(help_results):
found = json_capable(help_results)
assert found, "no script advertises --json; the discovery method is broken"
@pytest.mark.parametrize("name,args", sorted(JSON_RUNNABLE.items()))
def test_json_output_is_parseable_and_states_a_status(name, args):
result = run_script(name, args, timeout=120)
require_returned(result, "%s %s" % (name, " ".join(args)))
doc = parse_leading_json(result.stdout)
assert doc is not None, (
"%s %s printed no parseable JSON document:\n%s"
% (name, " ".join(args), result.output[-2000:]))
missing = [k for k in JSON_REQUIRED_KEYS if not isinstance(doc, dict) or k not in doc]
if missing:
present = sorted(doc) if isinstance(doc, dict) else type(doc).__name__
pytest.xfail("%s --json does not carry %s; top-level keys are %s"
% (name, missing, present))
@pytest.mark.parametrize("name", SCRIPTS)
def test_json_capable_but_unreachable_scripts_are_named(name, help_results):
"""Coverage honesty: a --json script is either exercised here or explicitly not."""
if not has_option(help_results[name].output, "--json"):
pytest.skip("%s does not advertise --json" % name)
if name in JSON_RUNNABLE:
return
pytest.skip("%s advertises --json, but reaching that path needs a device or a "
"sample; the gap is listed in EXTENSION-test-harness.md" % name)
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
# 5. the exit-code vocabulary
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
class TestExitCodeVocabulary:
@pytest.mark.parametrize("name", SCRIPTS)
def test_observed_codes_stay_inside_the_vocabulary(self, name, help_results,
badflag_results):
for label, result in (("--help", help_results[name]),
(BAD_FLAG, badflag_results[name])):
if result.returncode is not None:
assert result.returncode in CONTRACT_EXIT_CODES, (
"%s %s returned %r" % (name, label, result.returncode))
assert result.returncode is None or result.returncode >= 0, (
"a negative code is a crash signal, not an exit status: %s %s"
% (name, label))